Ajay S/O Deorao Ingole (In Jail) v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Ajani, Nagpur

ba.372.16 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [BA] No.372 of 2016 (Ajay s/o Deorao Ingole vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through its P.S.O. Ajani, District Nagpur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri C.R. Thakur, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri R.S. Nayak, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 5 th JULY, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel of the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

I have gone through the F.I.R. dated 10/07/2015 and the supplementary statement dated 09/08/2015 and 31/10/2015 of the complainant/prosecutrix. Considering these statements made at different time, an impression is created that the prosecutrix herself is not sure as to who is the real culprit or how many culprits are there. In this situation, this would be a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. Hence, the following order.

1. The application is allowed.

2. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- together with one solvent surety in the like sum on the conditions that the applicant shall

ba.372.16 2/2 attend the court dates regularly, shall co-operate with the trial Court in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

3. The application is disposed of as such.

JUDGE *sdw