Sumant S/O Purushottam Sawarkar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Collector, Nagpur And Others

wp2847.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2847/2022 ( filed in Vacation Court) Sumant Purushottam Sawarkar..Versus...State of Maharashtra and ors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr.Rohit Joshi, Advocate for petitioner Ms.N.P.Mehta, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. P.B.Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.4 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 31/05/2022 1] Ms. Mehta, learned APP for Respondent No.2 has tendered across the bar a pursis under the signature of officer of Respondent No. 2, who is present in the Court, stating that the house of the petitioner shall not be affected by the process of demolition of the compound wall, which alone is claimed to fall within the land claimed to be allotted to Respondent No.4. 2] The Pursis is taken on record and marked as "X" and it is directed that the same be scrupulously followed and the residential house of the petitioner should remain untouched.

3] In view of a statement, as contained in the pursis, which is accepted as a statement to the Court, Mr. Joshi,

wp2847.22.odt learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the purpose of the petition is satisfied and the petition be disposed of in terms of the pursis.

4] Petition stands disposed of in terms of what has been stated in the pursis dated 31.5.2022 marked as "X". JUDGE Rvjalit Digitally sign byRAJESH VASANTRAO JALIT Location: