Sushma Devlal Shirsat v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Women And Child Welfare Dept., Mumbai And ORS.

2025:BHC-NAG:4107-DB 1 132.wp.2110.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2110/2025 Sushma Devlal Shirsat Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. C. R. Kulkarni, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. I. J. Damle, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and2/State. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 21/04/2025.

Heard.

2.

Since, the petitioner is not holding appropriate qualification as an Anganwadi Madatnis viz. two years service and as the petitioner has completed one year and eleven months of service on the said post that by itself will not give leverage to the respondents to relax the recruitment condition for the post of Anganwadi Sevika. 3.

Even if the petitioner who was the sole candidate was considered for the post of appointment on Anganwadi Sevika, sans the requisite experience of two years, the petitioner's claim was rightly not considered. 4.

No case for causing interference is made out. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate violation of any statutory right or Rules. The petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule