← Library
Bombay High CourtCAL/9/2024rejected

Ashok B. Chavhan And Others v. Official Liquidator, Nagpur

2024-04-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare2 pages

25-CAL-7-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2016 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 5 OF 2001 (M/s. Krishidhan Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s Akola Oil Industries Ltd. & Anr.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri A.B. Patil, Counsel for the applicant.

Dr. Anjan De, Counsel for the Official Liquidator. Shri M. Anilkumar, Counsel for respondent no.2/S.B.I. .....

CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J.

APRIL 26, 2024.

Shri N.R. Raut, learned Counsel appearing for Prudent ARC Limited submits that S.B.I. has assigned various properties including property under question to Prudent ARC Limited. He seeks two weeks time to file appropriate application. Time is granted.

2] Stand over to 9/5/2024.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9/2024 3] By present application, about 49 workers, which includes legal representatives of workers, have proposed to purchase plot no. 147, admeasuring 2310 square meters @ Rs.14,000/- per square meter. 4] This property has been yet not put to auction and, therefore, there arises no question of considering the proposal, as put forth.

5] This Court has earlier made it clear that the workers and the persons, who are occupying the

25-CAL-7-2016 Company premises, should vacate the premises by 30/4/2024.

6] In the circumstances, the application and proposal, as filed, is not acceptable. The application is accordingly rejected.

(ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) Sumit