← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/3355/2019delay condonatedrejected

Ukanda Sitaram Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Collector, Yavatmal And Others

2021-01-12Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai2 pages

928.F.A.ST.9091.2019.

1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAF) No.3355 of 2019 IN First Appeal Stamp No.9091 of 2019 Ukanda Sitaram Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Collector & Ors. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri R.J. Shinde, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. Shamshi Haider, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri K.R. Lule, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATE : 12 th JANUARY, 2021.

By this application, the applicant has sought to condone the delay of 526 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and award dated 10th November, 2016 passed by the Reference Court in L.A.C. No.29/2007.

2.

In view of the reasons stated in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned, subject to the condition that the applicant shall not be entitled for any interest from the date of the impugned judgment till the date of the application. Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections, if any. 3.

The delay condonation application stands disposed of in above terms.

4.

Ms. Shamshi Haider, learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Shri K.R. Lule, learned counsel waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3.

928.F.A.ST.9091.2019.

2/2 5.

The matter be listed for admission after four weeks. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) vijay