Vimal @ Vimalabai Devrao Jamkar And Another v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Barshitakli Distakola

LDVC- BA 802.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application (BA) No. of 2020 (LD-VC No. 802 of 2020) [Vimal @ Vimalabai Devrao Jamkar and anr. Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Barshitakli P.S., Tq. Barshitakli, Dist. Akola] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court'

s or Judge'

s Order Coram, appearances, Court'

s Orders or directions and Registrar'

s order__________________________________________________________ Shri Mahesh Rai, Advocate for the applicants Shri P. S. Tembhare, APP for the State/non-applicant CORAM : M. G. GIRATKAR, J.

DATE : 10/08/2020 Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned Counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2.

Heard learned Advocate Shri Rai for the applicants. He has submitted that from the report, it appears that general allegations are made against the present applicants. The husband of deceased has not applied for bail. Both the applicants are ladies. Report does not show any active role of the applicants to instigate deceased to commit suicide.

3.

Heard Shri Tembhare, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. He has submitted that because of the instigation of the applicants, the deceased has committed suicide.

4.

From the perusal of report, it appears that main allegations are against the husband of deceased. General allegations are made against the present applicants stating that they were instigating the husband of deceased to

LDVC- BA 802.2020.odt direct her to bring Rs. 35,000/- from her parents. Looking to the allegations in the report, the applicants are entitled for bail. Hence, the following order.

(I) The application is allowed.

(II) The applicants be released on bail on executing PR Bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one solvent surety of like amount each on condition that they shall not tamper the evidence of prosecution witnesses.

5.

The application is disposed of.

6.

This order be communicated to the Counsel appearing for the parties, either on the email address or on WhatsApp or by such other mode, as is permissible in law.

JUDGE wasnik by Avinash Wasnik Date:

2020.08.10 18:11:00 +0530 Avinash Wasnik