← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/1374/2022ca disposed off

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Thr. Exe. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim v. Bhikusing S. Rathod Thr Mukhtiyar V. Bhikusing Rathod Thr. Lrs. Vijay Bhikusing Sanga Rathod And Or

2023-04-11Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

45.fa.201.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

FIRST APPEAL NO.

OF 20 (V.I.D.C. Vs. Bhikusing Sanga Rathod and ors.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs. U.A. Patil, Advocate for the appellant.

Shri M.M. Agnihotri, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms Udeshi, AGP for the State.

CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED :- APRIL 11, 2023.

Heard.

2.

ADMIT.

3.

Shri Agnihotri, learned Counsel for respondent No.1 and Ms Udeshi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.2 and 3, waive notice.

4.

Call for R. & P.

5.

The appellant to file private paper book within ten weeks, after receipt of R. & P.

6.

Place the matter for final hearing after filing of paper book and its verification, as per its turn. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1374 OF 2022 Heard.

2.

The application is for seeking permission for withdrawal of the amount which is deposited by the appellant.

3.

As per the contention of respondent No.1 that the appellant has deposited the amount of compensation.

45.fa.201.22.odt The applicant has already lost his land as well as source of income as the orange trees were standing on the acquired land. As the applicant has lost his source of income now he is in dire need of compensation amount and hence, the amount be disbursed to him.

4.

Said application is strongly opposed by the appellant on the ground that the applicant has challenged the judgment and award as the compensation amount awarded is exorbitant and excessive one.

5.

In view of the reasons mentioned in the application and considering the objection raised, it will be appropriate at this stage to permit respondent No.1 to withdraw 50% of the amount on usual undertaking and 25% of the amount on furnishing surety/security for the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial).

6.

The amount be disbursed on due identification and verification.

7.

Civil application is disposed of.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) *Divya Signed By:DIVYA SONU BALDWA Personal Assistant