Bombay High CourtCP/213/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Ujawala Wd/O Ashok Bhongade And Another v. K.Z. Shende The Education Officer (Sec.), Zilla Parishad, Bhandara

2015-08-28Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema2 pages

CP213-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.213/2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 566/2011 (D) (UJJAWALA ASHOK BHONGADE VERSUS K.Z. SHENDE, E.O. (SECONDARY), Z.P. BHANDARA) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.N. Shende, counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 28 , 2015.

By this contempt petition, the petitioner seeks action against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 12.03.2013.

According to the petitioner, though the respondent was directed by this Court to take a decision in respect of the entitlement of the petitioner to be appointed on compassionate ground, the respondent had not taken a decision. The respondent has filed an affidavit-in-reply. It is stated in the affidavit-in-reply that the decision is taken on 15.05.2013. It is stated that since the petitioner complained that no decision was taken, the respondent again issued a letter to the Secretary and the President of the Shikshan Sanstha on 11.06.2015 about the decision. It is stated that the President and the Secretary of the Sanstha have informed the respondent that the petitioner would be accommodated as and when a vacancy is available. Though the petitioner disputes that the decision was taken in 2013, the petitioner does not dispute that the decision is now rendered by the respondent in 2015.

Since we find that the Education Officer has taken a decision after hearing the petitioner, the contempt petition is

CP213-14 disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE