Pradeep Murari Keer v. State Of Mah Thr Its Secretary Home Department Mumbai-32

1 wp351.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.351 OF 2019 (PRADEEP MURARI KEER...VS.. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, HOME & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.K.Maheshwari, Advocate (appointed) for Petitioner. Shri A.M.Balpande, A.P.P. for Respondents CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : APRIL 23, 2019.

Heard.

2.

The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the respondent No.3 rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of emergency parole. The petitioner applied for emergency parole by application dated 21st July 2018 and then 26th October 2018 seeking release on parole on the ground of death of petitioner's mother. By efflux of time, the request made by the petitioner for grant of emergency parole has become redundant.

3.

At the time of hearing, the learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that regular parole may be granted to the petitioner to perform the rituals along with his family members. There is nothing on record to support the submission. Hence, we see no reason to grant the prayer made in the petition.

The writ petition is dismissed.

5.

The fees, to be paid to the learned Advocate appointed to represent the petitioner, shall be quantified as per Rules.

(VINAY JOSHI, J.) (Z.A.HAQ, J.) RRaut..