← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/272/2012disposed off

Pundlik S/O Jagoji Dhokne v. Govindrao S/O Deorao Bondre And 2 Others

2022-06-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak1 pages

248.sa.272.12 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Second Appeal No.272 of 2012 Pundlik s/o Jagoji Dhokne vs.

Govindrao Deorao Bondre & others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ms. R.V. Kukday h/f Mr. V.S. Kukday, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. D.A. Mohogaonkar h/f Mr. A.D. Mohogoankar, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

CORAM

: S.M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 8 th JUNE, .

Heard the learned Advocate for the appellant/defendant. 02] Though the suit was dismissed, the first appellate Court partly decreed the suit and defendant No.1-Pundlik Dhokane was restrained from running the flour mill without licence. This judgment was stayed during pendency of the second appeal. It is submitted that due to old age, the appellant has stopped running flour mill and he do not want to continue with the appeal.

03] The appeal is disposed of as not pressed. The parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE *sandesh Signed by:SANDESH DAULATRAO WAGHMARE Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge