Bombay High CourtWP/3179/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri Purshottam Laxmanrao Barahate And Others v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Finance Deptt. Mumbai And Others

2015-05-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

1 wp3179.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3179 OF 2014 [Shri Purshottam Laxmanrao Barahate and others .vs. State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.P. Thakare, counsel for the petitioners, Shri T.R. Kankale, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 5, Shri Ashish Kadukar, counsel for the respondent no.6. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATED : MAY 05, 2015.

Shri Thakare, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed in view of the statement made in para 5 of the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.4 that since the petitioners were appointed before the cut off date, the old pension scheme of the year 1982 would apply in their case.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, based on the statement made in para 5 of the affidavitin-reply filed on behalf of the respondent no.4, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande