← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4555/2017disposedoff

Lalitabai Shikshan Sanstha, Pulgaon Thr. Vijay Motiramji Aashtankar And Another v. Pravinkumar S/O Balkrishna Ghodkhande And Others

2020-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.V. Ghuge2 pages

1 cp242.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.242/2017 Pravinkumar S/o Balkrushna Ghodkhande ..V/s..

Shri Pravinkumar Tayal and another AND WRIT PETITION NO.4555/2017 Lalitabai Shikshan Sanstha, Pulgaon and another ..V/s..

Pravinkumar S/o Balkrishna Ghodkhande and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms S.S. Dashputre, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.G. Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. (C.P.242/17) Shri Prasad Dharaskar, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms S.S. Dashputre, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms M.A. Barabde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 6.1.2020.

1] The learned Advocate for the petitioner in the writ petition submits that this Court had issued certain directions vide order dated 1.11.2018. Those directions have been complied with by the Management. A Copy of the communication from the Education Officer (Secondary) to the Headmaster of the petitioner's school dated 7.1.2019 is placed on record indicating that the grievance of the employee is now redressed. The said communication is taken on record and marked as "X" for

2 cp242.17 identification.

2] The learned Advocate for the employee submits that considering the above, the contempt petition can be disposed off. The learned Advocate for the Management submits on instructions that the writ petition preferred by the Management can also be disposed off as the dispute between the parties is put to rest.

3] In view of the above, both these petitions stand disposed off. No costs.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Tambaskar.