Satpuda Shikshan Va Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Palsi, Jalgaon Jamod, Thr. Secretary And Another v. Deepika Suresh Ingle (Deepika W/O Nilesh Thakre) And Others
caw967.21.O.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.
IN WRIT PETITION NO.434 OF 2021 (Satpuda Shikshan Va Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Palsi (Vaidya), Dist. Buldhana thr. its Secretary and another Vs. Deepak Suresh Ingle (Deepika w/o Nilesh Thakre) and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs. Prajakta S. Chaudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Abhay Sambre, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. P. B. Patil, Advocate for Respondent 1.
Mr. K. L. Dharmadhikari, AGP for Respondent 3/State. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO , J.
DATE: 12 th JANUARY, .
The respondent - employee is seeking to withdraw the amount deposited by the management in purported compliance with the order dated 25.01.2021. 2.
The learned counsel for the respondent - employee Mr. Patil states that while the calculation and quantum is disputed, the employee may be permitted to withdraw the amount deposited, without prejudice. 3.
Although the learned counsel for the management Mrs. Prajakta Chaudhari is objecting to such withdrawal, I see no reason to reject the prayer. 4.
The employee may withdraw the amount
caw967.21.O.odt deposited by the management subject to furnishing an undertaking to refund the amount with interest at the rate of 7%, if further order/s with the litigation are adverse to the employee.
5.
The application is disposed of.
6.
It is clarified that the withdrawal shall be without prejudice to the contention of the employee that the order dated 25.01.2021 is not complied with and the calculation of 25% of the back-wages made by the management is incorrect.
JUDGE NSN SHIVNARAYAN NIKHARE