← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2916/2023disposed off

Best Security Services, Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Chaturvedi Thr. Poa., Rajendra A. Ojha v. Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Dept. Of Expenditure, New Delhi And ORS.

2023-10-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri1 pages

1 wp2916.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 2916 OF 2023 ( Best Security Services ..vs.. Union of India and others ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. N. Deshpande, DSGI for respondent No.1, Mr. S.S. Ghate, Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & ABHAY J. MANTRI , J J .

DATED : 31-10-2023 Pursuant to the order dated 03-5-2023 the petitioner's representation dated 12-4-2023 has been decided. Mr. S.S. Ghate, learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 submits that the said representation has been rejected.

2.

In view of aforesaid, since the prayer made in the petition is to direct respondent No.3 to decide the claim of the petitioner as per representation dated 12-4-2023, the purpose for filing the same is satisfied. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of the said representation, it is free to challenge the same if advised.

3.

Writ petition is disposed of.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) adgokar