← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1198/2001dispossed offdismiss for default

Pundlik Manikrao Tarode. v. The State Of Mah.Thr.Gen.Admn.Dept.And Another.

2015-03-20Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR PURSIS ST. NO.1967/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1198/2001 Pundlik s/o Manikrao Tarode ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.G. Joshi, Adv. h/f Shri A.S. Mardikar, Sr. Adv. for petitioner Mrs. A.R. Taiwade, AG for respondent no.1 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 20.03.2015 Perused Pursis St. No.1967/2015. It is stated in the pursis filed by the petitioner that the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the writ petition.

In view of the aforesaid statement made in the pursis, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar