← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPP/604/2016other disposed off

Jasjitsingh Singh S/O Pritamsingh Bhatia v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ramnagar, Gondia

2016-05-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 aba291.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 291 OF 2016 (JASJITSINGH PRITAMSINGH BHATIA...VS..STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS RAMNAGAR, GONDIA) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : MAY 04, 2016.

CRI.APPLN.NO.617/16.

Heard Shri S.V.Manohar, learned Senior Advocate a/b. Shri C.H.Jaltare, advocate for the complainant, Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, learned advocate for the applicant and Ms Bharti Dangre, learned Public Prosecutor for the Non-applicant / State.

Though the application is strongly opposed on the ground that if it is allowed it will amount to conferring locus on the complainant to participate in the proceedings relating to the incident, for the reasons stated in the application, the complainant is permitted to assist the prosecution. The criminal application is allowed.

CRI.APPLN.(ABA) NO. 291/2016.

Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.

2 aba291.16 The applicant apprehends arrest in the crime registered against five persons (including the applicant) for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 307, 294, 120-B, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusations against the applicant are that he has entered into criminal conspiracy to carryout the attack on the father of the complainant.

Considering the nature of accusations against the applicant and the facts on record, in my view, the applicant is entitled for pre-arrest bail.

Hence, the following order :

In the event of arrest in Crime No. 94 of 2016, registered by the non-applicant, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond for Rs.Twenty Thousand and one solvent surety in the like amount.

The application is allowed accordingly.

CRI.APPLN.(APPP) NO.604/2016.

In view of disposal of the main application, the application for grant of time to file certified copy of the order and say of the prosecution does not survive, hence, it is disposed of.

JUDGE RRaut..