← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2658/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Mai Saheb Samajik And Shikshanik Shikshan Sanstha Sarul Thr. President And Another v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary And Others

2016-11-30Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

WP2658-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2658/2016 (MAI SAHEB SAMAJIK AND SHIKSHANIK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, SARUL & ANOTHER VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.M. Ahirrao, counsel for the petitioners. Shri A.M. Joshi, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2.

Shri P.B. Patil, counsel for the R-3.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 30 , 2016.

It appears on reading the additional affidavit filed by the respondents that the impugned order is withdrawn. If that is so, the grievance of the petitioners would stand redressed.

The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE