Bombay High CourtWP/3047/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri. Madhukar Jangalsa Ghulhane Thorugh Its Poa Mohan Ramratan Jaiswal v. The State Of Maharashtra, Dept. Of Excise, Through Its Secretary Mantralaya, Mumbai And Others

2016-10-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3047/2015 Shri Madhukar Jangalsa Ghulhane through its Power of Attorney Holder Mohan Ramratan Jaiswal ...Versus...

The State of Maharashtra, Department of Excise, through its Secretary Mantralaya, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for petitioner Shri I.J. Damle, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK, J.

DATE : 10.10.2016 The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the cause for filing the writ petition is rendered infructuous due to passage of time. It is stated that the impugned order was to operate only for a period of 30 days and the period of 30 days expired during the pendency of the writ petition. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE Wadkar

C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

Uploaded by : S.S. Wadkar, P.S. Uploaded on : 10/10/2016