Bombay High CourtWP/4112/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Raju Gopichand Madankar President Parampujya Parmatma Ek Sewak Mandal Nagpur v. The Asstt. Charity Commissioner -2 Behind G.P.O. Nagpur

2017-09-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye1 pages

13.9WP.4112.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4112 OF 2016.

(Shri Raju Gopichand Madankar .vs. The Assistant Charity Commissioner & others) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Mr. A.P. Thakare, Advocate for petitioner, Ms. A.R. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1, Mr. Shashikant Borkar, Advocate for respondent no. 2. Mr. R.M. Bhangde, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2017.

Respective Counsel for private parties state that dispute is amicably settled in terms of Joint Pursis placed on record. We find that the Joint Pursis is signed by Counsel for petitioner, Counsel for respondent no.2 and Counsel for respondent no.3. They state that their clients, i.e. petitioner, respondent no.2 and respondent no.3 have placed signatures on Joint Pursis in their presence and accepted terms and conditions.

2] In view of Joint Pursis, accepting it on record as Exhibit 'X', we dispose of Writ Petition. No costs.

Judge Judge J.