← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/343/2016others disposed off

Sayed Sajid Ali S/O Sayed Zafar Ali And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Patur, Akola And Another

2016-08-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar3 pages

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.343 OF 2016 Sayed Sajid Ali s/o Sayed Zafar Ali and ors.

-vsThe State of Maharashtra, Thr. PSO, PS Patur, Dist. Akola. and anr. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

Dr A. H. Jamal, Advocate for applicant.

Shri J. R. Ghurde, APP for respondent No.1/State. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 18, 2016 Heard Dr J. H. Jamal, learned counsel for applicants, learned APP for respondent No.1 and Shri Abdul Subhan, learned counsel for respondent No.2.

We do not wish to go into merits of controversy. Respondent No.2-complainant is resident of Patur and she has filed complaint under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code at Patur Police Station. Consequent to the First Information Report, Learned APP informs that charge-sheet is also presented in the Court at Patur. Shri A. Subhan, the learned counsel submits that there is alternate and more effective remedy available to the applications. Dr A. Jamal, the learned counsel disputes this.

We find that applicant No.2 aged about 65 years is mother in law who resides at Nagpur. Applicant No.6 aged about 70 years is her sister. This sister resides at Akola. Applicant Nos.3, 5 and 7 are sisters of husband who reside either at Nagpur or Akola or Mumbai. Applicant No.4

2/3 brother of application No.1 reside at Nagpur. In this situation as this Court has already ordered no coercive steps on 06/05/2016, we find that interest of justice can be met with by granting exemption from personal appearance to applicant Nos.2 to 7 until the Court at Patur passes the order expressly requiring their presence. Applicant No.1 and Advocate of all the applicants can appear before the Court at Patur and move appropriate application seeking exemption or such other relief as the applicants may deem fit and proper. If such application is moved within period of four weeks from today, Court at Patur shall attempt to decide it as per law within next four months. With these directions and keeping all rival contentions open, we dispose of the application.

JUDGE JUDGE Asmita

3/3 -: C E R T I F I C A T E :- copy of the original signed Judgment/order."

Uploaded by :

Asmita A. Bhandakkar Personal Assistant Uploaded on :

20/08/2016