Bombay High CourtFCA/223/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Banobi Begum W/O Shaikh Rahematullah v. Shaikh Rahematullah S/O Abdul Rashid

2017-02-17Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.223/2014 Smt. Banobi Begum w/o Shaikh Rahematullah ...Versus...

Shri Shaikh Rahematullah s/o Abdul Rashid - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Kaple, Adv. h/f Shri A.M. Quazi, Adv. for appellant CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 17.02.2017 Shri Kaple, the learned Counsel holding for Shri Quazi, the learned Counsel for the appellant states that the parties have started residing together and since they are cohabiting, the cause for filing the family court appeal is rendered infructuous.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the family court appeal stands disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar