← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3574/2023allowed

Apang Jeevan Vikas Sanstha, Thr. President And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra,Thr. Secretary, Dept. Of School Education And Sports,Mumbai And Others

2023-06-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi2 pages

1 WP-3574-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.3574 of 2023 Apanga Jeevan Vikas Sanstha, through its President, Amravati and others

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court' s or Judge'

s order and Registrar'

s orders.

Shri Anand Parchure, Counsel for Petitioners. Ms N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents. CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , JJ.

ATE : 13 th JUNE, 2023 .

P.C.:

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Ms N.P. Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of notice for the respondents. 2.

The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the order dated 27-12-2021 passed by the respondent No.3- Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati thereby refusing to approve the appointment of the petitioner No.3. In the impugned order, it has been stated that in the light of the Government Resolutions dated 4-5-2020 and 5-5-2020, such approval cannot be granted. 3.

We find that the challenge raised in the present writ petition is similar to one which has been considered in various writ petitions, including Writ Petition No.5936 of 2022 (Anukuran Shikshan Sanstha and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and another) decided on 1-3-2023, wherein it has been held that the ban on recruitment would not be applicable to the Minority Institutions and on that basis, the order refusing to grant approval has been set aside. 4.

Since we find that a similar issue arises in the present writ petition, we are inclined to direct the respondent No.3- Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati to reconsider the petitioners' proposal dated 28-9-2021

2 WP-3574-2023.odt afresh in accordance with law and after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

5.

Hence, for the reasons contained in the judgment dated 1-3-2023 delivered in Writ Petition No.5936 of 2022, the order dated 27-12-2021 passed by the respondent No.3- Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati is set aside. It is directed that the respondent No.3 shall reconsider the proposal dated 28-9-2021 afresh in accordance with law and after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Necessary decision be taken within a period of four weeks from receiving the copy of this order.

6.

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as to costs. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) LANJEWAR LANJEWAR 17:41