Bombay High CourtCP/136/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Tapan S/O Chaitanya Biswas v. Smt. Nivedita W/O Tapan Biswas

2015-07-07Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

CP136-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 136/2015 IN F.C.A. NO.13/2015 (D) (TAPAN CHAITANYA BISWAS VERSUS NIVEDITA TAPAN BISWAS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Abhay Sambre, counsel for the petitioner. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JULY 7 , 2015.

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the contempt petition, this Court has, by an order dated 12.06.2015 in C.A.O. No.941 of 2015 extended the time to vacate the premises. It is stated that the respondent has vacated the residential house during the extended period. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE