State Of Maharashtra And 5 ORS v. Vijay Shamrao Muley

2203wp2300.04.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2300/2004 The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Irrigation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others ...Versus...

Vijay s/o Shamrao Muley - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Shamal Kadu, AGP for petitioners CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ.

DATE : 22/03/2018 1.

Employer - State Government questions order dated 10/12/2003 in Original Application No.74/2002 passed by Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal permitting respondent to cross efficiency bar w.e.f. 1/1/1992. Employer was also directed to release increments accordingly in pay scale of Rs.2000-3200 with arrears and then to fix it in 5th Wage Revision. 2.

This Court has on 13/9/2004 admitted matter for final hearing but refused to grant any interim relief. 3.

In 2002 respondent was 54 years old. Today, he is about 70 years of his age. Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has found that for certain adverse remarks not communicated to him he was withheld at efficiency bar.

4.

We do not see anything wrong with the approach of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. There is no jurisdictional

2203wp2300.04.odt error or perversity. Hence, writ petition is dismissed. Rule stands discharged. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar