Bombay High CourtWP/952/2001admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Dr.Arvind S/O Gulabrao Thakre And Another. v. Dr.Baban S/O Ramdasji Kamble And 2 Others.

2015-08-07Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

Letter-in-WP952-01(D) FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR LETTER IN WRIT PETITION NO. 952/2001 (D) (DR.ARVIND GULABRAO THAKRE VERSUS DR.BABAN RAMDASJI KAMBLE & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri B.B. Raipure, counsel for the R-1.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 18 , 2016.

Perused the contents of the communication received from the Registrar of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur.

For the reasons stated in the communication, the time to decide the original application is extended by four weeks.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE