Prashant S/O Madhukar Wankhede And Another v. The State Of Mah. And 8 Others

1 wp3950.05.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3950 OF 2005 [Prashant s/o Madhukar Wankhede and others .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.V. Bhide, counsel for the petitioners, Shri P.S. Tembhare, A.G.P. for respondent no.1, Shri Shakul Ghatole, counsel h/f Shri F.T. Mirza, counsel for the respondent nos.3 to 9.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2016.

The learned counsel for the parties state that the cause for filing the writ petition is rendered infructuous due to passage of time. It is stated that, by filing the writ petition, the election process initiated in the year 2005 for election to the Gram Panchayat was challenged.

Since the term of the members of the Gram Panchayat is only five years, the cause for filing the writ petition is rendered infructuous. We, therefore, dispose of the writ petition, as infructuous, with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA

2 wp3950.05.odt C E R T I F I C A T E "I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order."

Uploaded by : A.S. Gulande, P.A.

Uploaded on : 03.09.2016