Haridas J. Meshram And Others v. The Union Of India, Represented Through Secretary, Ministry Of Defence, New Delhi And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2567 OF 2020 Haridas J. Meshram and others - Vs. - The Union of India and others _____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri M.G. Burde, Advocate for Petitioners.

Ms. Sushma, Advocate for Respondents.

-------- CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATE : 11 JANUARY 2021 Heard Shri Burde, learned Counsel for the Petitioners.

2) By the impugned order, the Original Application filed by the Petitioners has been dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal primarily on the ground that the Petitioners have not joined the affected persons as party Respondents. 3) Shri Burde, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, submits that the Petitioners were ready and willing to join the persons adversely affected to

the Original Application, however, due to some miscommunication and misunderstanding, such stand could not be taken before the Tribunal.

4) We have perused the impugned order. The conclusion of the Tribunal is primarily based on the position that the Petitioners have refused to join the affected persons as party Respondents. Now since the Petitioners have realised that the stand taken by them was incorrect, we are of the prima facie opinion that the Tribunal may consider their stand, if they choose to file any Review Application. With these observations, we accept the prayer of the Petitioners to withdraw the petition to file a Review Application before the Tribunal. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)