← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3972/2024disposed off

Barkha D/O. Ashok Balkheria (Thakur) And Others v. The Collector (Nazul), Nagpur And Others

2025-02-14Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar2 pages

(1) 7 wp 3972-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3972 OF 2024 Barkha D/o Ashok Balkheria (Thakur) and others Vs.

The Collector (Nazul), Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------- - - - - - Shri N.A. Lalwani, Advocate for petitioners Shri B.M. Lonare, AGP for respondents/State CORAM : SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

DATE : 14.02.2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents/State. 2.

Petitioners filed present petition being aggrieved by the order passed by the Additional Commissioner dated 27/03/2024, in Appeal No. 15/MRC-81/2022, rejecting the application for amendment.

3.

I have perused the copy of application (page 45), wherein, the petitioners are seeking to add additional grounds in respect of order passed by the learned Collector. It is his contention that the objections which are required to be decided by the learned Collector were decided by the Nazul Tahsildar. In addition to it learned Counsel for the petitioners is also seeking consequential amendment in prayer clause.

(2) 7 wp 3972-2024 4.

In my considered opinion, there is no change in the nature of context, if such amendment is allowed. Amendments are required to be allowed if it goes to the merit of the matter and essential to resolve the issue involved in the matter. The learned Additional Commissioner failed to consider this aspect and without there being any reason rejected the application for amendment.

5.

The order dated 27/03/2024, passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nagpur, below application for amendment, is hereby set aside.

6.

The application for amendment is allowed.

7.

The petitioners to carry out amendment in Appeal No. 15/MRC-81/2022, within a period of two weeks. 8.

The petition stands disposed of.

(SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) Jayashree..