Bombay High CourtCAO/985/2015admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Vinayak S/O Atmaram Mundle v. Smt. Shakuntala Wd/O Vijay Mundle And Others

2015-06-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cao985.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.985 OF 2015 IN M.C.A. ST.NO.10405 OF 2015 IN REJ. WRIT PETITION NO.232 OF 2015 (VINAYAK ATMARAM MUNDLE..VS..SMT. SHAKUNTALA WD/O. VIJAY MUNDLE & 4 OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JUNE 12, 2015.

Heard Shri S.O.Ahmed, the learned advocate for the applicant/ petitioner.

As the registration has been refused by the learned Registrar, without issuing notice to the nonapplicants/ respondents and accepting the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 51 days is condoned. For the reasons, as stated above, the order passed by the learned Registrar on 13th July, 2015 is set aside and the writ petition is restored.

The petitioner shall remove the office objections within one month, failing which the writ petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court with costs quantified at Rs.One Thousand to be deposited by the petitioner with High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur. The CAO and MCA allowed in the above terms.

JUDGE RRaut..