Bombay High CourtCAO/1026/2015admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Santoshkumar S/O Sumramal Kalra And Another v. Sau. Vaishali W/O Dinanath Wakekar And Another

2015-07-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 cao1026.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1026 OF 2015 AND M.C.A. ST. NO. 10457 OF 2015 IN REJ. WRIT PETITION NO.233 OF 2015.

(SANTOSHKUMAR SUMRAMAL KAIRA & ANR...VS..SAU.VAISHALI DINANATH WAKEKAR & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JULY 08, 2015.

Heard Shri D.N. Dani, the learned advocate for the applicant/ petitioner.

The registration of the writ petition was refused for non-removal of the office objections. Considering these facts, without issuing notice to the non-applicants and accepting the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 51 days in filing the Miscellaneous Civil Application is condoned. The application is allowed.

For the same reasons the Miscellaneous Civil Application is also allowed.

The order passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) on 13th April, 2015 is set aside and the writ petition is restored.

Contd..

2 cao1026.15 W.P. NO. 233/2015.

If the office objections are not removed within two weeks, the petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court with costs quantified at Rs.One Thousand to be deposited by the petitioner with High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur.

JUDGE RRaut..