Darshan Jayeshkumar Shah, And 12 Others v. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University Nagpur Through Registrar, Nagpur And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WP No. 2220 of 2014 with WP No. 2512 of 2014 GH Raisoni Foundation & anr v. RTM Nagpur University/Darshan & ors v. RTM Nagpur University and anr _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr B. G. Kulkarni, Adv for petitioners in WP No. 2210/14 Mr Arun Agrawal, Adv for respondent ------ Mr R. H. Chandurkar, Adv for petitioners in WP No. 2512/14 Mr R. D. Bhuibhar, Adv for R-1 Mr B. G. Kulkarni, adv for R-2 CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND A. P. BHANGALE , JJ DATED : 7th January 2015 1.

This Court on 8th May 2014 after noting contention of petitioner-Institution that its name was wrongly included in list of 250 banned colleges and because of realization of that error, its students were permitted to appear in 1st semester examination, adjourned the matter to 20th June 2014. Request to permit those students to appear for 2nd semester examination then to commence shortly provisionally was not granted. It is not in dispute that thereafter the Nagpur University conducted special examination in the month of August 2014 and those students appeared for 2nd semester examination in that month.

2.

These writ petitions were then considered by this Court on 4th December 2014 and considering subsequent development, students who took 2nd semester special examination were permitted to appear in 3rd semester examination (regular).

3.

Writ Petition No. 2448 of 2013 and other connected petitions in which the question of ban or inclusion of names of colleges in list of 250 colleges was in dispute, came up before the Division Bench of this Court on 8th December 2014. The Division Bench on that date has considered CAW No. 3685 of 2014 moved in WP No. 2448 of 2013 by the Nagpur University. Application was granted and result of special examination was allowed to be declared. 4.

In this situation, it is apparent that present grievance is rendered infructuous. However, results of students of petitioner-Institution who had cleared 2nd semester examination or who were otherwise eligible to appear for 3rd semester examination shall be declared by the University in accordance with law at the earliest.

5.

With this direction, both these writ petitions are partly allowed and disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE joshi