← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/837/2023allowed

Dinesh S/O Ambadas Meshram And Another v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Rural Development, Mumbai And 3 Others

2023-07-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

1 905.cao.837.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C IVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.837/2023 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) No.9615/2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.

1570/2017 (D) Dinesh S/o. Ambadas Meshram and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. V. G. Wankhede, Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. S.A. Ashirgade, Additional Government Pleader for Non-applicant No.1. CORAM :

A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,JJ.. DATED :

21.07.2023 C IVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.837/2023 .

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

2.

The Civil Application is disposed of.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) No.9615/2023 .

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants and perused the grounds raised in the review application. The attempt on the part of the applicants is to re-argue the writ petition that came to be decided on 17.03.2023. Reliance is sought to be placed on the decision in State of Uttar Pradesh and Others Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava and Others [(2015) 1 SCC 347].

2.

We do not find any error apparent on the face of the record to invoke review jurisdiction. The grounds urged are those that can be considered in exercise of appellate jurisdiction. The Civil Application is therefore rejected. (MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.) RGurnule MANOJ MANDADE 18:53