← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3940/2005dispossed offdismiss for default

Ashok Bapurao Bhange And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

2016-09-01Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

1 wp3940.05.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3940 OF 2005 [Ashok Bapurao Bhange and others .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioners, Shri A.V. Palshikar, AGP for respondent no.1. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioners challenge the seniority list as also the promotions of the respondent nos.4 to 9 on the ground that they were juniors to the petitioners. It appears that during the pendency of the writ petition, by an order dated 3.7.2007, we had directed the respondent nos.2 and 3 to revert such persons that are juniors to the petitioners and promote the petitioners if they are otherwise eligible, within a period of one month from the date of the order that is 3.7.2007. It appears that the petitioners' grievance must have been redressed in view of the interim order passed by this court on 3.7.2007.

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA

2 wp3940.05.odt C E R T I F I C A T E "I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order."

Uploaded by : A.S. Gulande, P.A.

Uploaded on : 03.09.2016