Satish S/O Changoji Bansod v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Sadar Police Station, Nagpur And 2 Others

aba560.2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION (ABA) 560 OF 2020 (Shri Satish s/o. Changoji Bansod..vs.. State, thr PSO, Sadar, Nagpur and ors.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. M.A. Qureshi, counsel for applicant.

Mr. N.R. Rode, APP for non-applicants.

CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE:22.12.2020.

Heard.

2.

The applicant is apprehending arrest in Crime 382/2012, registered with Police Station, Sadar, Nagpur, for offence punishable under sections 403, 406, 465, 467, 481, 420, 120-B, 467, 409, 109 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The applicant was then working as Manager (Sales) of the UCO Bank. It is alleged that there was a vehicle loans scam in which loans were shown disbursed to fake persons. In so far as the applicant is concerned, the allegation is that he verified the documents pertaining to two borrowers. However, a fair statement is made by the learned APP Mr. N.R. Rode that custodial interrogation is not necessary since the relevant documents are seized and that the amount disbursed is repaid by the co-accused, who probably was the beneficiary of the irregularity.

aba560.2020.odt 4.

Considering the overall circumstances and the fair statement of the learned APP, on instructions, received from the Investigating Officer, who is personally present, the interim protection granted vide order dated 8.12.2020 is made absolute.

Judge Belkhede RS