← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/54/2024dismissed

Pranay S/O Govindrao Deshmukh Thr. His Mother Balini W/O Govindrao Deshmukh v. Yamini Pranay Deshmukh And 2 Others

2025-09-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas2 pages

1 / 2 32.appln54.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO. 54 OF 2024 Pranay s/o Govindrao Deshmukh Vs.

Yamini w/o Pranay Deshmukh and Ors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Kaustubh Deogade, Advocate for applicant. CORAM : RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.

DATE : 22.09.2025 The applicant-husband by this application is praying for transfer of the petition bearing Petition No.E/518/2023, pending before the Family Court, Nagpur, to the Family Court at Bhandara.

2.

The respondent-wife is duly served and Mr.

Gopal Bhajbhaje, Advocate, has filed his power also, but today none is present.

3.

The ground for transfer taken by the husband is his illness. He submits that he is suffering from seizure disorder and epilepsy.

4.

Mr. Deogade, learned counsel for the applicant has also brought to my notice the medical Prity

2 / 2 32.appln54.2024 certificate issued by the Medical Officer. It is his case that due to the aforesaid reason, it will be difficult for him to attend the Court at Nagpur.

5.

I have perused the documents.

6.

The documents filed by the applicant shows that the husband is suffering from the illness as stated above. The proceedings are initiated by the wife and two minor children for grant of maintenance. The reason, according to me, is not sufficient for transfer as proceedings can also be attended through a lawyer. 7.

The question of examination and crossexamination can be dealt with the Family Court, if appropriate application is made at the instance of the husband.

8.

In that view of the matter, no case is made out, therefore, the application stands dismissed.

(Rajnish R. Vyas, J.) Prity