← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/3415/2016ca disposed off

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Thr. Executive Engineer, Washim v. Vishnudas Ramsing Chavan And Others

2017-03-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

CAF3056.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CAF No.3056/2016 in FA St.No.10984/2016 VIDC through its Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division District Washim Vs.

Vishnudas Ramsing Chavan and others.

_________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Shri J.B.Kasat, Advocate for applicant.

Shri Thakre Advocate, h/f Shri M.M.Agnihotri, Adv. For respondent no.1.

Shri Sonak, AGP for respondent nos. 2 and 3.

CORAM : N.W.SAMBRE, J.

DATE :

MARCH 30, 2017 CAF No. 3415/2016 Heard.

The application is opposed by the learned counsel for respondent no.1. However, for the reasons stated in the application, delay caused in preferring appeal stands condoned.

CAF No.3056/2016 Consider the appeal on merits, it appears that the learned Reference Court has adopted comparable sale method for valuation of the land so

CAF3056.16 as to ascertain the market value of the acquired land and reliance placed upon sale deed Exh.26 of villageWaigaul, dated May 10, 1996. The said village is admittedly not adjacent to the land under acquisition. No reasons for considering the said sale instances could be noticed in the judgment/order under challenge.

In view thereof, leave granted.

FA St.No.10984/2016 Heard.

Admit.

Shri Thakre, learned counsel, h/f Advocate M.M.Agnihotri, waives notice for respondent no.1 and Shri Sonak, learned A.G.P. waives notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

Paper book will be filed within a period of six month from today. If the paper book is not filed within the time stipulated, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. It is clarified that the appellant has not deposited the amount of compensation. As such, the respondent no.1 is at liberty to execute the decree. JUDGE Andurkar