Rajesh S/O Tukaram Shelar v. The Inspector General Of Police, Western Sector, C.R.P.F. Navi Mumbai And Others

03.07.WP.5203.17

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5203/2017 (Rajesh s/o Tukaram Shelar vs. The Inspector General of Police, Western Sector and others) .............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Ms. Anita Shinde, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Saurabh Chaudhari, Counsel for respondents CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 3rd July, 2019 The upgradation claimed in the petition under Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), is governed by the criteria at Sr. No.18, which is reproduced below:- "18.

The financial upgradation would be on non-functional basis subject to fitness, in the hierarchy of grade pay within the PB-1.

Thereafter for upgradation under the MACPS the benchmark 'good' would be applicable till the grade pay of Rs. 6600/- in PB-3. The benchmark will be 'very good' for financial upgradation to the grade pay of Rs. 7600 and above."

It is an undisputed position that the petitioner did not meet this criteria and, therefore, he was denied the

03.07.WP.5203.17 benefit of upgradation. In the next year, the petitioner could not be assessed because he sought voluntary retirement from service.

The Writ Petition is dismissed.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare