Dr.Archana D/O.Vasantrao Dhotre(Now Dr.Av Gawande) v. The State Of Mah. And 3 ORS.
10.07.wp.3514.97+
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3514/1997 (Shri Tushar s/o Namdeorao Bhangale vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO.4025/1999 (Batau s/o Bapuji Bhadke vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO. 922/2000 (Dr.Vikas Rameshrao Yedshikar vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO.926/2000 (Dr. Mujibur Rehman H.Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO.1047/2000 (Dr .Varsha Madhavrao Ghawat vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO.2164/2000 (Dr. Archana d/o Vasantrao Dhotre vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO.927/2001 (Dr. Vinaykumar s/o Meharaban Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra and others) AND WRIT PETITION NO.1217/2001 (Dr. Shobhana s/o Bapurao Mhaske vs.
State of Maharashtra and others) ...................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Ms. Ratna Singh Adv. h/for Mr. Amol Mardikar, Advocate for petitioner/s in W.P. Nos. 922 and 926 both of 2000 Mr.N.S.Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent-State CORAM : R.K.DESHPANDE & MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
D ATED : 10th July, 2017.
In all these matters, validity of Rule 1 of the PostIn all these matters, validity of Rule 1 of the PostGraduate Admission Rules laid down under the Government Graduate Admission Rules laid down under the Government Resolution dated 24.10.1991 to the extent it excludes Resolution dated 24.10.1991 to the extent it excludes
10.07.wp.3514.97+ graduates from Amravati University for being considered for graduates from Amravati University for being considered for grant of admission to post-graduate courses in Government grant of admission to post-graduate courses in Government Medical College/s at Nagpur, is under challenge. In several Medical College/s at Nagpur, is under challenge. In several matters, interim orders were passed directing the consideration matters, interim orders were passed directing the consideration of the claim of the petitioners in accordance with merit. It is of the claim of the petitioners in accordance with merit. It is informed that some of the petitioners got admission in postinformed that some of the petitioners got admission in postgraduate courses and they have completed the same.
In some of graduate courses and they have completed the same. In some of the petitions, the Court had directed one seat to be kept vacant. the petitions, the Court had directed one seat to be kept vacant. The learned counsel for the petitioner/s in Writ Petition The learned counsel for the petitioner/s in Writ Petition Nos. 922 and 926 both of 2000 submits that by passage of time Nos. 922 and 926 both of 2000 submits that by passage of time and subsequent change in the policy of the Government for and subsequent change in the policy of the Government for admission to post-graduate courses, the petitions have become admission to post-graduate courses, the petitions have become infructuous.
infructuous.
Shri N.S.Rao, the learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri N.S.Rao, the learned Assistant Government Pleader also submits that subsequently there was a common entrance test also submits that subsequently there was a common entrance test prescribed for admission to the post-graduate courses in prescribed for admission to the post-graduate courses in Government Medical Colleges and, by passage of time, all these Government Medical Colleges and, by passage of time, all these petitions have become infructuous.
petitions have become infructuous.
In view of the above, all these petitions are dismissed as In view of the above, all these petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
infructuous.
JUDGE JUDGE sahare