Vinayak Daulatrao Kale v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Special Land Acquisition Officer And Sub-Divisional Officer, Amravait

caf2168 to 2170 of 2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 2168 OF 2019 with CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 2169 OF 2019 with CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 2170 OF 2019 in FIRST APPEAL (FA) NO. 163 OF 2016 (Vinayak Daulatrao Kale Vs. The State of Maharashtra and anr.] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order__________________________________________________________ Shri Sawan Alaspurkar, Advocate for the appellant Shri H. D. Dubey, AGP for the respondent no. 1 CORAM : M. G. GIRATKAR, J.

DATE : 11/06/2019 Heard learned Advocate Shri Alaspurkar for the appellant and learned AGP Shri Dubey for the respondent no. 1.

Learned Advocate for the appellant has submitted that legal hairs could not be brought on record within limitation. The delay is caused due to miscommunication by the parties to the Counsel. Delay is bonafide. Looking to the grounds mentioned in the applications, the applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. Legal hairs of the appellant to be brought on record within two weeks. The Applications are disposed of.

JUDGE SMGate