Bombay High CourtWP/2958/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Nandkishor S/O Sahebraoji Bodkhe v. The State Of Maha. Through Secty., Department Of Cooperation Marketing And Textile, Mumbai And ORS

2017-07-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo2 pages

1 wp2948.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 2948 OF 2016 (Vishal s/o Babusing Rathod ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2875 OF 2016 (Vilas s/o Gunwant Pundkar ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2958 OF 2016 (Nandkishor s/o Sahebraoji Bodkhe ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4530 OF 2016 (Radheshyam s/o Surajbhan Sharma ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4604 OF 2016 (Shivajirao s/o Dadajirao Magar ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4608 OF 2016 (Shri Ramkrushna s/o Bhaurao Patil ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra and others) WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4633 OF 2016 (Shankar s/o Baburaoji Bhiwarkar ..vs..

The State of Maharashtra and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for the petitioners, Smt. K.D. Deshpande, AGP for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND ROHIT B. DEO, JJ.

DATED : 07-07-2017 Seen pursis tendered by Advocate Shri P.S. Kshirsagar for the petitioners and heard respective Counsel.

Challenge in the writ petitions is rendered infructuous. However, the representation made by APMC seeking approval to its proposal permitting its

2 wp2948.16 employees to the post of Secretary still pending. We direct respondent No.2 to consider that proposal as per law in next six weeks.

With these directions, we dispose of the petitions. JUDGE JUDGE adgokar