M/S Parshva Associate...... v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran

WP2940-03 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2940/2003 (M/S PARSHVA ASSOCIATES VERSUS MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN, AMRAVATI) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioner.

None for the respondent.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 8 , 2016.

None appears for the petitioner and the respondent, when called.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the communication dated 02.07.2003 issued by the respondent cancelling the work order issued to the petitioner for supply of Liquid Chlorine Gas.

The record indicates that the petitioner was granted the work order for the year 2003-04. While admitting the writ petition on 08.08.2003, this Court had granted interim relief staying the effect and operation of the impugned order. As a consequence, the purpose for filing the writ petition appears to have been served and the petitioner must have supplied the Liquid Chlorine Gas for the year 2003-04.

Hence, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE