Bombay High CourtCAW/1198/2015admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

J.K. Education Soc., Nagpur v. Shri Sunil Uaike And 32 ORS.

2015-07-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 caw1198.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1198 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1876 OF 2009.

(J.K.EDUCATION SOCIETY...VS..SUNIL UIKE AND OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Shashank V. Manohar, Advocate for Petitioner/Applicant Ms D.R.Muley h/r. Mr. Rohit Deo, Advocate for Resp.Nos. 1 to 32. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JULY 08, 2015.

Considering the nature of controversy, in my view, the documents sought to be filed by the petitioner will be of assistance at the time of deciding the writ petition. The petitioner is permitted to incorporate the proposed amendment and to place the documents on the record.

The Civil Application is allowed.

JUDGE RRaut..