← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4689/2011dispossed offdismiss for default

Krushnakumar S/O Parchandaji Jadhav v. Union Of India Thr. Min. Of Finance And ORS

2017-02-24Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4689/2011 Krushankumar s/o Parchandaji Jadhav ...Versus...

Union of India through Ministry of Finance Department of Banking North Block New Delhi through its Secretary and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri U.N. Vyas, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 24.02.2017 Shri Vyas, the learned Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has expired and the legal heirs of the petitioner are prosecuting their remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. It is stated that the rights of the legal heirs of the petitioner would be governed by the orders of the said Tribunal.

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar