← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/158/2020disposed off

Kalpana W/O Prakash Nimje v. Prakash S/O Pundlik Nimje

2022-03-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

1 cp158.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 158 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1630 OF 2019 (D) ( Kalpana w/o Prakash Nimje ..vs.. Prakash s/o Pundlik Nimje ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.P. Hedaoo, Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Y.S. Khobragade, Counsel for the respondent. CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO , J .

DATED : 16-03-2022 It is common ground that the direction to pay Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) per month to the wife for the period March 2020 is complied with, albeit with certain delay.

2.

I am satisfied that there is no reason to initiate contempt action.

3.

However, the husband is put on notice that if there is any irregular payment in future, there could be a reasonable inference that the conduct and delay is not innocuous.

4.

Subject to what is observed, the petition is disposed of.

JUDGE adgokar MANOHARRAO ADGOKAR