Bombay High CourtBA/983/2020dismissed as withdrawn

Sheikh Shahrukh Sheikh Ismail v. State Of Mah. Ps Yashodara Nagar Dist.Nagpur

2021-04-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

ba983.20.113.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.983/2020 Shaikh Shahrukh Sheikh Ismail .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO P.S. Yashodhara Nagar, Nagpur.

AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.113/2021 Mohd. Shafi s/o Mohd Hafiz Pathan .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO P.S. Yashodhara Nagar, Nagpur.

_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Mr.P.W. Mirza, Advocate for applicant in B.A.No.983/20 Mr.C.R.Thakur,Advocate for applicant in B.A.No.113/21 Mr. K.L.Dharmadhikari,A.G.P. for non applicant-State. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : APRIL 1, 2021 Hearing was conducted through video conferencing and the learned counsel agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

These two applications for regular bail arise since applicants in these two applications are arrested in connection with Crime No. 162/2020 registered with Police Station, Yashodhara Nagar, Nagpur for an offence punishable under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.

Entire charge-sheet is placed on record in both these two applications.

Detailed hearing was given to Mr. Mirza and Mr. Thakur, learned counsel for the applicants. I have also heard Mr. Dharmadhikari, learned A.P.P. for non applicant-State in both these two applications.

ba983.20.113.21.odt With able assistance of learned counsel, I have gone through the entire charge-sheet placed on record. After hearing was complete, when this Court expressed its opinion that the Court is dismissing both the applications, Mr. Mirza and Mr. Thakur learned counsel for the applicants in both these applications, would submit that they wish to withdraw the present applications.

The applications are, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.

Since both the applications are withdrawn, this Court is not giving detailed reasons as to why both the applications deserve dismissal.

JUDGE kahale