← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/664/2020delay condonatedrejected

Smt. Priti Wd/O Nitin Nikhar And Others v. Pyarelal S/O Mangilalji Kalal And Others

2021-01-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak2 pages

F.A. St.5561.2019.

1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No.664 of 2020 IN Miscellaneous Civil Application Stamp No.9718 of 2020 IN First Appeal Stamp No.5561 of 2019 Priti wd/o Nitin Nikhar & Ors. Vs. Pyarelal s/o Mangilalji Kalal & Ors. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ms. Aastha R. Sharma, Advocate h/f Shri P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for the Appellants. CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 7 th JANUARY, 2021.

The learned Registrar (Judicial) has refused the registration of the appeal as per the order dated 13th August, 2019. It was for non-removal of the office objections. 2.

Now, the appellants undertake to remove all office objections.

3.

Hence, there is delay of 400 days in filing restoration application. The reasons are convincing in both the applications. Hence the order:-

O R D E R

i.

Both applications are allowed.

ii.The delay caused in filing restoration application is condoned subject to removal of the office objections within a period of seven days.

F.A. St.5561.2019.

2/2 iii.The First Appeal Stamp No.5561/2019 is restored. iv.Both civil applications are disposed of.

JUDGE vijay