Ajay S/O Rammohan Tiwari v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation Through Municipal Commissioner And 2 Others

93pil64.13.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

P.I.L. No.64 of 2013 (Ajay s/o. Rammohan Tiwari .vs. N.M.C. and Ors.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's orders Mr.M. Anil Kumar, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr.S.M.Puranik, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr.M.J.Khan, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mrs.B.H.Dangre, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM : B.R.GAVAI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 9.3.2017.

Heard.

Mr.M. Anil Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that, since the learned Counsel for the Respondent/Nagpur Improvement Trust has made a statement that, on account of it's abolition, the Nagpur Improvement Trust would not be charging half percent (0.5%) cess under Section 77 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Hence, the present Public Interest Litigation is disposed of by taking on record the statement made on behalf of the Nagpur Improvement Trust.

No order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE jaiswal