Bombay High CourtWP/2701/2003dispossed offdismiss for default

Raviraj Chunnilal Ghormare v. State Of Maharashtra Thr.Its Secty. And 2 ORS.

2015-03-30Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

WP2701-03 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2701/2003 (RAVIRAJ CHUNNILAL GHORMARE VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.S. Parsodkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : MARCH 30 , 2015.

Shri Parsodkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause for filing the writ petition would not survive as by the impugned order, the petitioner was disqualified from holding the post of the Councilor on the invalidation of his tribe claim. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of. Rule stands discharged.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE