Shubham @ Bunty S/O Chindhuji Mahurle v. The State Of Mah, Thr P.So. Po.S. Bajaj Nagar, Nagpur
1 ba 442.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Criminal Application (BA) No. 442 of 2019 Shubham @ Bunty s/o Chindhuji Mahurle Vs.
The State of Maharashtra - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri C.R. Thakur, Advocate for the applicant Shri H. D. Dubey, APP for the State/non-applicant CORAM : M. G. GIRATKAR, J.
DATED : 16/07/2019 Heard learned Advocate Shri Thakur for the applicant. He has submitted that after passing the order dated 16.01.2019 by this Court one of the accused namely, Ankush Badge, is arrested before filing the charge-sheet and he has been released by trial Court on bail. Learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the mother and daughter who made the conspiracy are also released on bail by the trial Court.
Shri Dubey, learned APP for the State/non-applicant has strongly objected the application.
Detail reasons are recorded by this Court while rejecting application on 16.01.2019. Again and again, on the same ground application cannot be entertained. There is no material change. It is observed by this Court that the present applicant is
2 ba 442.2019.odt main culprit/conspirator to kill the deceased, who were working as a Lecturer in the College at Chandrapur. His wife and daughter made the conspiracy with the present applicant to kill the deceased. This Court has also observed that trial Court while rejecting the application of bail recorded the detail reasons in para 6 of his order. Hence, there is no material change, therefore, his application is not tenable. The application is rejected. JUDGE SMGate