Ku.Archana Sanjabrao Gawande v. State Of Maharashtra And 3 ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2603/2003 Ku. Archana d/o Sanjabrao Gawande ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary Tribal Development, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.H. Joshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 Shri A.M. Sudame, Advocate for respondent nos.3 and 4 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : 26.02.2016 By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of the Project Officer, dated 31.5.2003 cancelling the approval to the appointment of the petitioner as a Hostel Superintendent.

Shri Sudame, the learned Counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4 states, on instructions, that the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed as during the pendency of the writ petition, the approval was granted to the appointment of the petitioner as a Superintendent w.e.f. 1.7.2000. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. Rule is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar